Posts Tagged ‘unemployment rate’

The housing market hasn’t hit bottom yet

March 31st, 2011
By: Eric Lundin

A headline at CNN’s money page caught my eye recently: “Why house prices will keep falling.”

The article cited the Case-Shiller U.S. House Price Index, which showed a 3.1 percent decline from January 2010 to January 2011. The gist of the index, developed by Karl Case and Robert Shiller, is that home prices tend to follow inflation.

On the surface, that seems obvious. Inflation, which probably should be called price inflation, is just that—increases in prices relative to the value of the dollar. Most prices, including prices paid for homes, increase steadily over time, and economists use these increases to calculate inflation. Economists often separate food and fuel because they are volatile, leaving core inflation, which tends to be steady. Case and Shiller did something different. Instead of pulling out fuel and food, they separated house prices. According to their research, home prices generally follow inflation. The key is that they generally follow inflation; when home prices diverge from core inflation, Case and Shiller expect them to later realign. If home prices rise faster than other prices, home prices later fall. (more...)

New year, next generation

January 3rd, 2011
By: Tim Heston

Tacking yet another new calendar to the wall makes me feel, well, old, and that in turn makes me think about the next generation. Judging by chats with readers in recent weeks, I’m not the only one. It’s no secret that manufacturing has a graying work force. Even during tough times, metal fabricators struggle to find talent graduating from high schools, technical colleges, and engineering schools.

(more...)

Giving thanks for skill, engagement, and curiosity

November 22nd, 2010
By: Tim Heston

Later this week I’ll be stuffing a turkey (and myself) and giving thanks--thanks for family and friends, of course, but also for something my mind’s been mulling over for the past few weeks: human engagement, and not the betrothal kind. I’m just talking about direct, concise, clear engagement with one another. Earnest, curious communication would be another phrase for it.

The Sunday New York Times ran an expose on how youth engage with each other. The undertone was plain. We’re all worried about the next generation’s attention span. Electronic doodads distract them continually, and over time some of them have become multitasking extraordinaires, which worries us. They’re good at doing a mediocre job of a lot of tasks at once, and mediocrity doesn’t bode well for our future. Can these kids concentrate, learn, ask questions, and become engaged, productive workers who can compete in a global economy? Every generation seems to go through this. TV was supposed to make us all zombie-like nitwits. So was radio. The digital age has made things a bit different this time, but it doesn’t keep me up at night.

Still, mass media has devoted column-inches to subjects of this ilk in part because it relates to the big unknown in America’s future. A few weeks ago I quoted a recent Bloomberg Businessweek article, which referred to Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Minneapolis Fed. He estimates that this country’s current job opening rate is 2.3 percent. That’s a lot of jobs, and filling all of them would reduce the country’s unemployment rate significantly.

(more...)

Waiting for the first shoe to drop

September 23rd, 2010
By: Eric Lundin

I looked at my colleagues’ blog posts (or rants as Tim calls them) and noticed that employment is a hot topic, so I figured I’d throw out my two cents’ worth on the topic. I think it’s fair to say that nearly everyone—not just people in manufacturing, but everyone—is wondering when the jobs are going to come back, and while I don’t have an answer, I think I can shed some light on this.

The unemployment rate gets a lot of press during recessions. It’s the main job situation barometer, but it has some drawbacks. It is updated just monthly is subject to several revisions. Another strand of job-related data, the number of claims for unemployment insurance, might be a better indicator. It is tallied weekly and revised just once.

Before I go any further, I should point out that neither of these data sources is a perfect indicator of joblessness.

The number of claims for unemployment insurance is probably the more accurate of the two. It’s based on initial or continued claims for unemployment insurance, which are filed by the unemployed in each state and counted at the federal level. The problem is that some people are unemployed for long periods of time; if they haven’t found employment when the benefits expire, they are no longer counted. In contrast, the unemployment rate is less accurate. It’s based on periodic household telephone surveys, so it’s just a random sampling.

Moving along, how do the two correlate? Not perfectly, but the relationship is clear. The number of initial claims for unemployment insurance rises before the unemployment rate rises, and falls before the unemployment rate falls. In other words, in comparing the two, initial claims for unemployment insurance is pretty reliable as a leading indicator.

Unemployment Ins. Claims vs. Unemployment Rate

That said, the two don’t rise and fall by the same amounts or at the same rate. Throughout the 1990s, for example, the unemployment rate decreased more or less steadily. It fell from 7.1 percent in February 1993 to 3.9 percent in December 2000. During the same time frame, the number of claims had quite a few ups and downs, varying from 266,000 per week to 380,000 per week.

What’s happening now? Initial claims peaked at 663,000 per week in April 2009. It fell to 433,000 per week in January and has bounced around a bit since then, but in the grand scheme of things, it has been flat ever since. The unemployment rate peaked at 10.1 percent six months later (October 2009). It has fallen a bit, but essentially it has held steady and remains at 9.6 percent.

What’s happening next? That’s hard to say, but the number of initial claims is worth watching. The unemployment rate won’t fall until the number of initial claims for unemployment insurance falls, and the unemployment rate will lag by several months.

: JpK4t&i!Kcr*

Jobs are here, but qualified people aren’t

September 21st, 2010
By: Tim Heston

Everyone says the U.S. government should foster an environment of job creation. I can’t argue with that. Thing is, some jobs are being created.  Employers just can’t find anybody to fill them.

According to a recent Bloomberg BusinessWeek article, Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Minneapolis Fed, estimates that this country’s current job opening rate is 2.3 percent. Filling all job openings would bring the country’s unemployment rate down significantly, from 9.6 percent to 6.5 percent.

Wow. That unemployment rate sounds a little closer to normal.

(more...)