Posts Tagged ‘chinese manufacturing’

The moral imperative of U.S. manufacturing

March 21st, 2012
By: Tim Heston

The mainstream press and pundits now seem to be realizing that globalization isn’t about finding cheap labor. No, it’s now about something that on the surface is a lot drier and more complex: the manufacturing supply chain.

New York Times reporter David Barboza--who earlier this year wrote the expose on iPhone production at Foxconn--put it this way on NPR’s This American Life: “Some say that you could build an iPhone in the U.S. for just $10 extra a phone, if you were paying American wages. But labor is such a small part of any electronic device, compared to the cost of buying chips, or making sure you have a plant that can turn out thousands of products a day, or making sure you can get strengthened glass cut just right within two days of the project being due.

“Labor is almost insignificant,” he continued. “What’s really important are supply chains and flexibility of factories. You want a plant that’s located right next to the screws, so that when you need a small change to that screw, you can go over there and say, give it to me in six hours, and they can say here you go. If that factory were in another state or continent, it would take two weeks. It’s the flexibility of the Chinese manufacturing system.”   Sure, U.S. manufacturers can offer some incredible flexibility--but generally not to the scale that China now offers.

The show’s host Ira Glass then stuttered a bit. This was a grueling episode for him. The entire hour essentially was a retraction for an earlier show about Mike Daisey, who has a one-man show that details his trip to Foxconn factories. When performing, Daisey opines about bad working conditions in China. But his show, it turns out, isn’t entirely factual, which some may feel is fine for performance art, but not for journalism. Well, at least good journalism.

After his idiosyncratic stutter, Glass said he felt guilty for owning and using an iPhone. Should he feel bad? Should all of us?

(more...)

Manufacturing and the State of the Union

February 1st, 2012
By: Tim Heston

For the past two years Mary Isbister, president of Wisconsin fabricator GenMet (one of The FABRICATOR’s past Industry Award winners), had a friendly bet with colleagues of the Manufacturing Council, a group that meets to propose ideas to Commerce Department Sec. John Bryson, who in turn reports those ideas to the president.

How many times would the president mention manufacturing in his State of the Union address?
(more...)

Head offices head to China

January 11th, 2011
By: Tim Heston

If Dave Westphal doesn’t qualify as a lean manufacturing champion, I don’t know who would. The executive is director of global lean manufacturing for Nexteer Automotive, a $2 billion automotive supplier specializing in steering and front-axle components. Last year The FABRICATOR covered his lean accomplishments, including his use of video to streamline worker movements. It turns out worker ergonomics leads to greater efficiency and greater overall throughput.  It’s a progressive place, one that shows how competitive manufacturing in the U.S. can be.

Oh yeah, did I mention that Nexteer is now a Chinese-owned company?

(more...)

The world needs customers

August 2nd, 2010
By: Tim Heston

“What the world lacks is willing customers, not willing workers.”

That statement in this week’s The Economist magazine may be one of the most insightful among all the worried economic chatter in the media these days. The magazine’s cover story this week covers the woes of the Chinese worker, no longer docile migrant laborers willing to make pennies. According to the magazine, Chinese wages have risen 17 percent over the last year alone. Moreover, “Chinese labor costs tripled in the decade after 1995, but output per worker quintupled.”

The article continued: “China’s economy relies too much on investment and too little on consumer spending…. Letting wages rise at the expense of profits would allow workers to enjoy more of the fruits of their labor.”

(more...)

Labor is not a bad word

April 27th, 2010
By: Tim Heston

Countless talking heads have argued for and against globalization. Some say it’s an unstoppable force, as companies continue their hunt for the company that gives the most bang for their buck. In manufacturing, that often translates to the cheapest labor that can meet or exceed required quality standards. Others have said fuel costs have changed the math behind the global supply chain. As the economy emerges from recession, fuel costs are sure to rise, and once they do, outsourcing certain work to factories across the ocean won’t make as much sense as it once did. Still others argue that lean manufacturing, the new norm, forces the supply chain to react just in time, and it can’t do this if it has to ship large parts across an ocean.

This is all just math, though—measurements of money and time—and I’ve got a feeling that it’s not the real reason that so many are so passionate. I think it’s more about our view of labor. In manufacturing, labor has turned into a bad word. Managers succeed in part by reducing the labor content within the parts they produce. The less labor it takes to make something, the better. (Even the phrase labor content is a bit dehumanizing.)

No wonder manufacturing has trouble attracting skilled workers. What budding skilled tradesperson, one who has a passion for the attributes of hands-on metalworking, would want to join an industry that has given the word labor such a bad name?

(more...)